Injury pensions are calculated using the table in Schedule 3 of The Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006.
Only four parameters are needed for the calculation,
Annual Pensionable Pay (‘APP’)
Length of service
Level of disability (band 1 to 4 as determined by the Selected Medical Practitioner (‘SMP’), shown in increments of 25% in the table.)
Any other police pension (as defined under schedule B of the Police Pension Regulations 1987, which can be Ordinary, Ill-health, Deferred or Short service.)
Here is the table from schedule 3,
Degree of Disablement
Gratuity expressed as % of average pensionable pay
Minimum income guarantee expressed as % of average pensionable pay
Less than 5 years’ service
5 or more but less than 15 years’ service
15 or more but less than 25 years’ service.
25 or more years’ service
25% or less (slight disablement)
More than 25% but not more than 50% (minor disablement)
More than 50% but not more than 75% (major disablement)
More than 75% (very severe disablement)
The annual pensionable pay, length of service, and level of disability are used to calculate the Minimum Income Guarantee. You then deduct three-quarters of the value of any other pension (before any commutation is taken, and may be across multiple pension pots). This will give you the value of your annual injury pension.
Disablement and the ordinary duties of a police officer
Annex B of PNB Circular 03/19 defined the ordinary duties of a member of the force for the purpose of assessing permanent disablement as follows,
• Managing processes and resources and using IT; • Patrol/supervising public order; • Incident management, such as traffic and traffic accident management; • Dealing with crime, such as scene of crime work, interviewing, searching and investigating offences; • Arrest and restraint; • Dealing with procedures, such as prosecution procedures, managing case papers and giving evidence in court
Inability, due to infirmity, in respect of any of the following key capabilities renders an officer disabled for the ordinary duties,
• the ability to sit for reasonable periods, to write, read, use the telephone and to use (or learn
to use) IT; • the ability to run, walk reasonable distances, and stand for reasonable periods; • the ability to make decisions and report situations to others; • the ability to evaluate information and to record details; • the ability to exercise reasonable physical force in restraint and retention in custody; • the ability to understand, retain and explain facts and procedures;
Reaching state pension age will have no affect on your injury pension. The injury pension is designed to compensate you for your loss of earning capacity due to the injury that you suffered whilst on duty. If you are still otherwise able to work at state pension age, then you will still have a loss of earning capacity to be compensated for.
The infamous Home Office circular 46/2004, suggested that at state pension age, the pensioner no longer had any earning capacity and the injury pension should be reduced to its lowest band.
Once a former officer receiving an injury pension reaches the age of 65 they will have reached their State Pension Age irrespective of whether they are male or female. The force then has the discretion, in the absence of a cogent reason otherwise, to advise the SMP to place the former officer in the lowest band of Degree of Disablement. At such a point the former officer would normally no longer be expected to be earning a salary in the employment market. A review at age 65 will normally be the last unless there are exceptional circumstances which require there to be a further review.
This advice was later deemed to be unlawful because a person cannot suddenly lose their ability to work overnight simply because they have reached state pension age (currently 65 and rising), or are in effect just a day older.
Of course, regulation 37(1) allows forces to review your injury pension if a suitable interval has passed, but this suitability is not dependent upon reaching any particular age.
The qualifications of a Selected Medical Practitioner (‘SMP’).
The expression Selected Medical Practitioner (‘SMP’) is referred to in the following regulations,
the Police Pension Regulations 1987
the Police Pension Regulations 2006
the Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006
the Police Pension Regulations 2015
and is a term synonymous with the role of a “duly qualified medical practitioner” which also appears in all of the aforementioned regulations.
The qualifications of an SMP were defined in HO Circular 21/2003 as follows,
Ideally, the SMP should be a Member or Fellow of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine (MFOM or FFOM), or EEA equivalent. The minimum requirement should be that he or she is an Associate of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine (AFOM) or EEA equivalent. Before appointment as SMP the police authority must provide the medical practitioner concerned with an induction programme and other training so that he or she has an understanding of what police service entails.
The Police Pension Regulations 2015 define “duly qualified medical practitioner” as follows,
“duly qualified medical practitioner” means a registered medical practitioner who holds—
(a) the minimum qualification of Associate of the Faculty of Occupational Medicine or the equivalent EEA qualification; or
(b) any other equivalent qualification acceptable to the scheme manager;
The term H1 is regularly used when referring to injury awards, but what does it mean and where does it come from?
In simple terms, it refers to the certificate provided by the Selected Medical Practitioner (‘SMP’) confirming the following questions,
whether the person concerned is disabled
whether the disablement is likely to be permanent
whether the disablement is the result of an injury received in the execution of duty
the degree of the person’s disablement
The mnemonic ‘H1’ derives from the Police Pension Regulations 1987, which curiously used a system of letters and number to identify the various sections of the act. This is the section,
H1-(4) The decision of the selected medical practitioner on the questions referred to him under this Regulation shall be expressed in the form of a certificate and shall, subject to Regulations H2 and H3, be final.
Injury awards are now administered under The Police (Injury Benefit) Regulations 2006, and regulation 30 of replaces section H1, where instead of a certificate, a report is now provided,
30-(6) The decision of the selected medical practitioner on the question or questions referred to him under this regulation shall be expressed in the form of a report and shall, subject to regulations 31 and 32, be final.
That said, people often still refer to this report as a H1.
Before a Police Pension Authority (‘PPA’) may revise an injury pension during a ‘reassessment of injury pension‘ under regulation 37(1), they shall refer the question of ‘the degree of the person’s disablement‘ to a duly qualified medical practitioner, as confirmed in regulation 30(2)(d) –
30.-(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, the question whether a person is entitled to any, and if so what, awards under these Regulations shall be determined in the first instance by the police authority.
(2) Subject to paragraph (3), where the police authority are considering whether a person is permanently disabled, they shall refer for decision to a duly qualified medical practitioner selected by them the following questions—
(d) the degree of the person’s disablement; and, if they are considering whether to revise an injury pension, shall so refer question (d) above.
What this means is, that whilst any paid employment the pensioner is performing may be considered by the Selected Medical Practitioner (‘SMP’) as an indication to their current level of disability, it does not allow non medical staff, regardless of their rank or role to recalculate a new level of disability based on their income, and therefore a new band.
Before a review, or a “reassessment of injury pension” can take place under regulation 37(1),the Police Pension Authority (‘PPA’) must firstly consider whether a suitable interval has elapsed. This is the first part of Regulation 37(1) –
37.—(1) Subject to the provisions of this Part, where an injury pension is payable under these Regulations, the police authority shall, at such intervals as may be suitable…
A suitable interval is not defined in the regulations, but was touched upon in ‘The Queen on the Application of Turner v The Police Medical Appeal Board’ –
para 23 – There is no question of relitigation and, of course, suitable intervals suggests that this is not a matter which should be revisited every year, nor is it.
Each case should be considered on its own merits as to whether a suitable interval has passed. In our view, it may be, due to the severity of a pensioners injury, that a suitable interval may be determined as ‘never’.
The regulation used to review an existing award is 37(1). A review, or a “reassessment of injury pension” to be more accurate is a comparison exercise from the date of your award, or your last review to the present day. This is confirmed in the case of Metropolitan Police Authority v Laws & Anor  –
para 18 – So much is surely confirmed by the terms of Regulation 37(1), under which the police authority (via the SMP/Board) are to “consider whether the degree of the pensioner’s disablement has altered”. The premise is that the earlier decision as to the degree of disablement is taken as a given; and the duty – the only duty – is to decide whether, since then, there has been a change: “substantially altered”, in the words of the Regulation. The focus is not merely on the outturn figure, but on the substance of the degree of disablement.
This means that the SMP has to identify a substantial alteration in the pensioners disability from the last assessment. A fresh assessment just based on the here and now is not permitted.
Kent Police have just released the news that a 21 year old man has been charged with the murder of Kent PCSO Julia James. We are thinking of Julia's family, friends and colleagues at this time. ... See MoreSee Less
We listened to the Lloyd Kelly case yesterday against South Yorkshire Police which seemed to go well. The judgment will be reserved which means it will be handed down at a later date. Mr Kelly, as many of you will recall, applied for his IOD award many years after being ill health retired due to not knowing about this extra pension. The problem he faced was that SYP refused to backdate the application to the date of his retirement and only paid him from the date of his application instead, meaning he has potentially missed out on eleven years of pension.If you have suffered in a similar way where your force has refused to backdate the IOD award to the date of your IHR, we would like to hear from you asap. Contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org.We wish Mr Kelly all the best and hope he gets the result he deserves after many years of suffering through numerous court cases on this very issue. ... See MoreSee Less
We can’t speak highly enough of @iodpaorg. These guys fight tooth & nail for #police officers and their injury benefits. The ill health & IOD process can be brutal, more so when suffering from #trauma & #PTSD. @iodpaorg make things easier. Support them 🙏